Search for: "Mark v. Mark" Results 661 - 680 of 34,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman was sufficiently clever to discern that if his “method” led to a conclusion that silicone gel breast implants cause autoimmune disease, but the Institute of Medicine, along with court-appointed experts, found no basis for a causal conclusion, then by modus tollens Egilman’s “method” was suspect and must be rejected.[1] This awareness likely explains the extent to which he went to cover up his involvement in the plaintiffs’ causation case in the silicone… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
They pick up on their previous comments about whether section 9(3) CDPA on computer-generated works operates as an exception to the originality requirement, especially in light of the E&W Court of Appeal decision in THJ Systems v Sheridan. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
 This stream invites contributions interested in unravelling the interconnected questions of Empire, colonialism, capitalism, settler law, sovereignty, prosperity/austerity, extractivism, debt and the possibilities for decolonial justice through reparations.Exploring Tensions in Law and Legal SemioticsConvenors: René Cornish (University of New England), Kieran Tranter (Queensland University of Technology), Wei Yu (University of Melbourne)Contact: Wei Yu… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Gallet, Dreyer &Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks andcitation omitted].) [read post]