Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
A. at V(B)(1). [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
Tam filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register “The Slants” as a federal trademark. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:03 pm
As we mark the 25th anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
The opinion has more references to Justice Roberts, the author of 1936’s United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:22 pm
His words were heartening: “People around the world, regardless of their nationality, should know that the United States is not spying on ordinary people … and that we take their privacy concerns into account,” he said, standing in front of American flags at Justice Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
Amplifying this argument is the provision of Twitter’s Term of Service that specifically requires that “You may use the Services only if you . . . are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
Want to amaze your friends with your ability to predict the outcome of cases argued in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:40 am
UNITED STATES, EX REL. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
UNITED STATES, EX REL. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
Further Reading: Opinion: Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
United States. [read post]
