Search for: "Marriage of Perry" Results 661 - 680 of 1,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2019, 6:55 am by Howard Friedman
Niranjana, A Study on Religious Laws and Religious Crimes in India, (August 26, 2019).Cyra Akila Choudhury, Reflections on the Christchurch Massacre: Incorporating a Critique of Islamophobia and TWAIL, (TWAILR: Reflections - 9/2019).Perry Dane, Echad: A D’var Torah on Parshat Vaetchanan, (August 17, 2019).Mark Kelman, What is in a Name? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:00 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Several high-profile American politicians—among them former presidential candidates Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum—have signed a “Marriage Vow” document produced in 2011 by the conservative organization Family Leader, according to Newsweek. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
As you, the reader of a legal blog, undoubtedly know, earlier today Judge Walker released his opinion in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:08 am by Guest Blogger
OPM), and the other invalidating California Prop 8’s elimination of the right of same sex couples to marry, which the California Supreme Court had upheld just months before (Perry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:31 am by pfurey
The First Circuit's decision last week paired with the Ninth Circuit's decision not to further review Perry raises the possibility that the Supreme Court may weigh in on questions of marriage equality under the Constitution sooner rather than later. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:29 pm by Suzanne Ito
For all its inspiring rhetoric, however, the Perry decision doesn’t decide marriage for everyone (even marriage for Californians is still subject to appeal and likely to end up before the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia, Perry v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Christopher Zorn
As people probably know by now, today a three-judge panel struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:56 am by Joel Jacobsen
  That $28,000 in jewelry bought on a single day during the months before his second marriage. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm by Andrew Brasher
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am
Windsor, decided the same day, which invalidated the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:39 pm
Sad-face Newt is asked about the Marianne interview and "open marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm by Sheppard Mullin
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]