Search for: "Matter of Crawford"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
No matter; the court allowed the statements to Pabon and the police office as an “excited utterance. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
-Bridget Crawford [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
Massachusetts, holding that scientific evidence was testimonial under Crawford, and therefore required confrontation of the person who actually performed the tests, was an amicus brief by the National Innocence Project detailing the inaccuracies of supposedly “reliable” forensic evidence. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:58 am
Justice Crawford agreed and awarded the Plaintiff $40,000 in damages. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
No matter; in light of the other evidence, it’s harmless. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
The idea of appointing a woman, then, didn't matter all that much. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
-Bridget Crawford [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Mr Fulks makes an argument that DUI evidence such as the breath test printout and the breath test machine calibration certificate does not fall under the Confrontation Clause as set out in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
The Court also concluded that the admission of out-of-court hearsay statements at the pretrial CrR 3.6 hearing did not violate Crawford. http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/62679-5.pub.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:23 am
Irizarry presents a tricky hearsay/Crawford question. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
Pennsylvania, 09–1396, PA S.Ct., involving whether a child’s statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
1. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:28 am
The Court of Appeals held that the breathalyzer report was not testimonial under Crawford. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:50 am
The statement in Crawford was a classic example of that: it was a statement that Crawford’s wife had made to the police, and was admitted under the declaration against penal interest exception to the hearsay rule when the wife couldn’t testify because of the spousal privilege. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm
The Office of Inclusion, Diversity and Equal Opportunity at Case Western Reserve is presenting this free, public lecture, "Why Diversity Matters in the Obama Era," with support from KeyBank, its corporate sponsor. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:33 am
There’s a new conservative sheriff in town, at least according to Jan Crawford. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:18 pm
The justices asked whose purpose matters, the speaker or the questioner's. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
If the justices write on the case – not inevitable, because there is the possibility of a 4-4 split – they may well resolve some of these issues.Underpinnings of Crawford; relation of confrontation and hearsay law – Justice Breyer indicated misgivings about how Crawford has developed. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:06 am
-Bridget Crawford Tweet This Post [read post]
