Search for: "Matter of Earls" Results 661 - 680 of 716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am by Jonathan Holbrook
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Supreme Court released on December 17, 2021, and decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on January 4, 2022. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm by Jamie Markham
Justice Earls wrote a concurring opinion questioning whether the Good Samaritan law in G.S. 90-96.2, which came into effect in 2013, placed a limit on the trial court’s jurisdiction to prosecute the defendant in this case. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:40 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals was therefore reversed in part and the matter remanded for a new trial. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
  Thus, as a matter of public policy, Iowa already considers sexual orientation irrelevant to parenting, and is happy to place children who need a home with same-sex couples. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Mitchell, No. 01-4278 Petitioner's habeas petition in a capital matter is granted, where Petitioner's counsel provided ineffective assistance at the guilt phase of Petitioner's trial by calling an expert witness who testified that Petitioner was sane at the time of the murders, an opinion that contradicted Petitioner's only defense. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
” He judged the issue to be a matter of “taste and decency. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Representing Virginia will be its state Solicitor General, Earle Duncan Getchell, Jr. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Parliament had already decided the matter with the Representation of the People Act 1983. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm by Phil Dixon
No Bivens remedy for First Amendment violations by federal prison officials Earle v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:21 pm
One saw that most clearly in the way that policy and policy determinations were made in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. by the Trump Administration; or for that matter by the temptations to use information platforms, like Twitter to spy.The analogy is provided by Isaac Asimov's Prelude to Foundation, and the search for a way to model (simulate) humanity. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Groups as disparate as the NFL Players Association, Nike, Amazon, and the Mayo Clinic have enlisted help from firms to lobby on the matter. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Joint Performance Review Committee agreed to turn the matters over to the ethics panel after Sen. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by The Legal Blog
The expression `speaking order' was first coined by Lord Chancellor Earl Cairns in a rather strange context. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
LEXIS 62 Injury AOE/COE—COVID-19—Burden of Proof—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that applicant did not sustain injury AOE/COE to her psyche and internal system as result of COVID-19 infection allegedly contracted during her employment as hospital dietician, and returned matter to trial level for further development of medical record, when WCAB reasoned that in cases of communicable diseases such as COVID-19, where it may be impossible… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The therapeutic approach adopted in certain domestic violence matters appeared to be largely successful in deterring recidivism through counselling while promoting family reunification at an early stage in the proceedings. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am by Bexis
  We omitted a lot of pages dealing with the plaintiff’s technical objections to the doctor’s testimony (including an interesting flip flop from the A/Z plaintiffs' usual position on treater expert testimony), because we don’t think they matter in this context. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm by Stuart N. Brotman
Viewed in a larger context, this matter represents the first time since the 1971 Pentagon Papers case where any judge has issued a prior restraint order against a media outlet. [read post]