Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H."
Results 661 - 680
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Beach, Cameron H. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
No matter whether it is a marriage of convenience or a matter of deeper ideological commitments, the Obama Administration now finds itself in the position of having the health insurance industry as its greatest (only?) [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
Dehney and Michael H. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Why Nuclear Disarmament Matters. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:58 pm
Scientific-Atlanta in today's Washington Post; and this editorial in today's LA Times discusses the Leegin decision, "whose frivolous subject matter concealed some important implications for U.S. business. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
Richard H. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm
The Clean Air Act contains a "harmless-error rule" that instructs courts not to invalidate a regulation due to "procedural errors" unless "the errors were so serious and related to matters of such central relevance to the rule that there is a substantial likelihood that the rule would have been significantly changed if such errors had not been made. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am
Grand juries—and, for that matter, civil litigants—routinely employ subpoenas for phone records, and any such subpoena necessarily reveals something about a person's associations. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
We do the same here with the expectation that FDA will give petitioners the benefit of a full and fair regulatory proceeding on remand, notwithstanding its prior promises to reject their applications no matter what. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 10:46 am
After dispensing with various preliminary matters, Judge Oldham outlines the substantive claim. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
H/T Keith Kaplan [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
(h/t to David Waldstreicher who I had a generative conversation about this topic with 2022.) [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Recently, Kacyn H. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
Dachs and Jonathan A. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Thomas Redding of Redding & Assoc. in Houston, will argue for John and Pamela Hinck, while Assistant to the Solicitor General Jonathan Marcus will argue on behalf of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
UPDATE: Paul Clement's letter to the firm has been published on the net (h/t: Volokh) and it implies that the matter was dropped not because of the conflicts restrictions but rather because the legal position was considered "extremely unpopular in some quarters. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
The irony is rich, as Jonathan Chait pointed out in a column earlier this week: Do you remember the years and years of hysterical right-wing denunciations of unilateral executive action by the Obama administration? [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Research still matters, so I recommend video from the Federal Trade Commission’s 15th Annual Microeconomics Conference, if you’ve not already seen it. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
For an initial summary, here is co-blogger Jonathan Adler. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:20 am
Treviño, Jonathan B. [read post]
