Search for: "Maxwell v. Maxwell" Results 661 - 680 of 742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by INFORRM
His book ‘Celebrity and Royal Privacy, The Media and the Law’ was published by Sweet & Maxwell in December 2015. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
 Release 33 of Sweet & Maxwell's European Patent Decisions, which updates the Looseleaf to August 2010, has now been dispatched and should be in the hands of subscribers soon, if they have not already received them. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
London : Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2012 xlv, 251 p. ; 22 cm. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Perhaps more interestingly, and certainly to me at the time, it was when the defendant distributors tried to strike out his libel claim against them on the grounds of abuse of process (Goldsmith v Sperring [1977] EWCA Civ J0223-1) in the appeal presided over by Lord Denning MR that Bridge LJ, with whom Scarman LJ expressly agreed, publicly chastised the Master of the Rolls as follows: “The Legal Liability of the Distributors. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
He sat as a First Tier Information Rights Tribunal Judge for ten years until retirement in 2017 and is the author of Celebrity and Royal Privacy, the Media and the Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Virginia Roberts, the woman who claims she was an “underage sex slave” for financier Jeffrey Epstein, has settled her defamation claim against the woman she claims recruited her, Ghislaine Maxwell. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am by INFORRM
In the case of  Robert Willis v Elvin Maxwell 11-09-00275-CV the Texas Court of Appeals held that an official at Texas Tech University did not defame a student by repeating allegations that the student had pulled a gun on a classmate. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  In X & Y v Persons Unknown ([2007] 1 FLR 1567 at [42]-[49]). [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
The view that reputation alone, without customers in the UK, is not enough for a passing off claim dates back to Maxwell v Hogg (1867) LR2 Ch 307 (which involved a claim for passing off where the plaintiff had advertised though had not yet sold the product). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
London : Sweet & Maxwell : Thomson Reuters, 2011 xxiv, 488 p. ; 22 cm. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]