Search for: "May v. Commonwealth" Results 661 - 680 of 3,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 1:52 am by Michael DelSignore
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court reversed an involuntary manslaughter conviction in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The defense expert felt that he may have suffered from stress induced short-term dissociation, which would explain his inability to recall his actions that day. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
The Executive is subordinate to the law and is answerable to the elected Members of Parliament. 1437: Aidan O’Neill QC states that the court is not being asked to create a whole new set of rules on when prorogation may justly be used or for how long. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
The facts seem to have been a little more complicated in Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Also, says Sixth Circuit, the Commonwealth of Kentucky is on the hook for $222,695 in attorney's fees incurred in a different lawsuit challenging Kim Davis' refusal to issue marriage licenses. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm by HRWatchdog
At this time, AB 5 is the only legislative vehicle still in play regarding Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:03 pm by David Duncan
  Those questions were addressed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Wallace W., a Juvenile v. [read post]