Search for: "May v. United States, The et al" Results 661 - 680 of 3,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
In his remarks on the amendment, Hutchinson indicated that it was designed to address “the growing threat that the People’s Republic of China poses to the citizens of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:42 pm by Eric Caligiuri
The only court in the United States with more authority over patent related issues in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:26 pm by Corynne McSherry
This may seem obvious, but it’s important to understand the goal of the proposal and then match that goal to its likely actual impacts. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:46 am by Bill Marler
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In Uniformed Fire Officers Association et al. v. de Blasio et al., Nos. 20-2789-cv, 20-3177-cv,  the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, addressed a number of issues arising after the repeal of §50-a of New York State's Civil Rights Law. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
A DMCA counternotice requires the following: The subscriber’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the subscriber consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the subscriber’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the subscriber will accept service of process from the person… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:42 pm by Lydia Estep
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]