Search for: "Mazie"
Results 661 - 680
of 783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[f]or the first time since 1996 it is July and the Supreme Court still has cases to rule on[; w]ith eight decisions to go in a term disrupted by covid-19, the justices are saving some closely watched cases for last. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that the Court this Term “struck down an unusually large number of statutes,” notably Section 3 of DOMA and Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie highlights the “tension between principle and practicality” in Chiafalo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “[a] long-running disagreement over how to read statutes fuels the split between the court’s liberals and conservatives. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Carrie Severino at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos, and Ed Mannino at his eponymous blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie explains that “[a]ll the justices seem to agree that Congress can write a new law targeting flat-out profanity or vulgarity as long as only modes of expression—not ideas themselves—are cabined. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
” Briefly: In The Economist, Steven Mazie takes a look at the Supreme Court term that began last week, noting that “despite the dearth of doozies,” “the docket does feature significant disputes, including a large handful involving race,” and predicting that until confirmation of a new justice ends the current 4-4 deadlock, the court “will probably duck pending petitions from a transgender Virginia high-schooler who wishes to use the boy’s washroom… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” Additional coverage of the DACA case comes from Jess Bravin, Brent Kendall and Michelle Hackman for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required); Tucker Higgins at CNBC; Pete Williams at NBC News; Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, (subscription required); Jonathan Blitzer at The New Yorker; Steven Mazie for The Economist, here and here, and on The Intelligence podcast here; Richard Wolf for USA Today, here and here; and Nina Totenberg at NPR, here, here,… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie explains why the court “opted for the path of least resistance” in the case. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 4:39 am
The flip side is that if two guys did this to Senator Mazie Hirono, this would have been characterized less generously. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Andrew Hamm rounded up early coverage of the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg for All Things Considered, who also had a story with Mara Liasson and a video; from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America Blog; from Chantal Valery and Robert Macpherson for Agence France-Presse (via Yahoo! [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie also reports on the argument, concluding that the “tenor of the oral argument suggests that a majority of the justices may be on Mr Peña-Rodiguez’s side. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
Coverage of the arguments comes from Steven Mazie in The Economist, who notes that “the justices seemed exasperated by their perennial role as overseers of” efforts by state legislatures to “pay attention to race when drafting electoral maps—but not too much attention. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Steven Mazie at The Economist, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Bill Mears at Fox News, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[e]ven some of the court’s liberal justices expressed concerns about the law, but they compared the requirement to Supreme Court-sanctioned laws requiring doctors… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the federal government’s highly unusual request for Supreme Court review of a lower-court decision preventing the federal government from dismantling the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, even though the appeals court has not yet ruled on the case, remarking that “[t]here is a lot of chutzpah packed into the DoJ brief. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back to last week’s oral arguments in Harris v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at Rucho v. [read post]
