Search for: "Means v. Brooks" Results 661 - 680 of 899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
Education: SUNY at Stony Brook B.A. 1979, Philosophy and Religious Studies; Yale University M.A. 1980, Philosophy; Yale Law School J.D. 1988; Harvard University Ph.D. 1997, Philosophy. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 am by SHG
Brook DiDonato, who represents Burlington County. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am by INFORRM
  He held that the words complained of were capable of bearing the defamatory meaning that the claimant was a liar. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:03 pm
In the recent unpublished Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division case of North Star Saddle Brook Management, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Comment Interim libel injunctions are relatively rare but can be granted if “it is clear that no defence will succeed at the trial”(Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2005] QB 972 per Brooke LJ at [57]). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
(For those who are interested: The majority cites my amicus brief as making an argument that it rejects, and Justice Scalia cites one of my articles, Grappling with the Meaning of "Testimonial", 71 Brook. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
x Consumer Law and Policy Blog reports: In a closely watched case, the California Supreme Court on Thursday issued a decision preserving the broad availability of the state’s principal consumer protection laws in cases involving mislabeled goods.The question at issue in Kwikset v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Brooks Farms, 821 S.W.2d 925, 927 (Tenn. 1991). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by John Elwood
Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (Ohio Supreme Court) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Center for Democracy & Technology Petitioner’s reply Title: Brooks v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm by Betsy McKenzie
(see brief article here by attorney Mark Bello announcing in summer, 2009, Ohio House Bill 248 effective August 27, 2008, Ohio Revised Code § 1349.55) (Mark Bello turns out to work for Lawsuit Finance, and blogs at Lawsuit Finance Blog) (Ohio's Supreme Court had first declared litigation finance barred by champerty, in Rancman v. [read post]