Search for: "Michael W. Powers" Results 661 - 680 of 1,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Laws that disadvantage pregnant women don’t discriminate based on sex, the then-all-male Supreme Court declared, because they distinguish between “pregnant women and nonpregnant persons,” and “[w]hile the first group is exclusively female, the second includes members of both sexes. [read post]
Making this claim would be the height of hypocrisy, of course, because the Supreme Court relied on Florida’s supposed wish to comply with the Electoral Count Act as the basis for its December 2000 ruling to stop the counting of ballots in the Sunshine State and hand the presidency to Republican George W. [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:48 am by admin
Post-Sale Responsibilities in the United States and Foreign Countries (Kenneth Ross & George W. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet it represents a highly influential idea about what equity means—equity is about the exceptional case, the unforeseen circumstance, the extension of a law to a case that is within its spirit but not quite within its letter.[2] This sense of equity can be seen in William Blackstone’s description of “equitable interpretation” of a statute: [I]f the parliament will positively enact a thing to be done which is unreasonable, I know of no power in the ordinary forms of… [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Michael Pidgett called vidders grassroots cinephiles who spot something latent in an image and feel the need to make it prominent and clear to others. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
  At the Huffington Post, Christine Pelosi responds to the Justice’s remarks by contending that “[w]omen in America cannot achieve our full economic and personal fulfillment as long as the concentration of wealth and power in the top 1% continues to stifle democratic voices and progressive policies,” concluding that “[t]o achieve equality, feminists can’t deal with injustice by agreeing to ‘shut it off’ — we must pursue Citizens… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
  At the Huffington Post, Christine Pelosi responds to the Justice’s remarks by contending that “[w]omen in America cannot achieve our full economic and personal fulfillment as long as the concentration of wealth and power in the top 1% continues to stifle democratic voices and progressive policies,” concluding that “[t]o achieve equality, feminists can’t deal with injustice by agreeing to ‘shut it off’ — we must pursue Citizens… [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:28 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Michael Glennon wrote a good book that agreed with my descriptive point about the continuity-preserving power of the bureaucracy and argued that this power was largely illegitimate. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
Congress could bugger up the criminal investigation by granting General Michael Flynn (or other witnesses) immunity in exchange for their testimony. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  As I wrote for the UK’s Guardian back in 2011, Murdoch assembled a remarkably powerful legal team to stanch his losses. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Morse, University of Texas at Austin School of Law; Eric W. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 10:02 am by Elsa Kania
Chuck Grassley of Iowa has declared, “I can’t pronounce their name, but it starts with an H and ends with a W-E-I. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Has to do with tech change, networking of users, state of © reform, and particular political activists like Michael Geist mobilizing a user community base. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Russell Spivak, Jordan Brunner
Even so, many, including former Acting Director of the CIA Michael Morell, have called Bannon’s permanent invite “unprecedented. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Karen Tani
The Nation also covers Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism (Cornell University Press), by Michael Barnett. [read post]