Search for: "OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER v"
Results 661 - 680
of 11,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
These defendants owned 100 percent of AR Capital, but took RCAP public, retaining only a minority interest in RCAP. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 4:35 pm
In Freedman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
Denying Public defender client adjournment did not violate rights State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
The case is State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
The case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am
" Sam then radioed a police officer, who arrived shortly thereafter and issued defendant a citation for misdemeanor offensive littering, a Class C misdemeanor Note that some Oregon cities have ordinances expressly banning public urination, but I couldn't find any Oregon state statute that does so. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 am
In its notice of decision, the defendant's hearing officer denied the appeal, concluding in relevant part that the plaintiff was "liable to repay the State of Connecticut for public assistance issued to her" and that the state "may hold a lien on [the plaintiff's] real property to secure [its] claim for all amounts previously paid . . . . [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Columbia) (Sep. 6, 2012 Opinion); United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-2919; Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:23 pm
When the car stopped at a traffic light at an intersection near a public park, the police officers in the car behind it determined that its inspection sticker had expired. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:23 pm
When the car stopped at a traffic light at an intersection near a public park, the police officers in the car behind it determined that its inspection sticker had expired. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
By guest blogger Tyler Ochoa If your literary or artistic work is copied by a state government or state officials, can you sue those defendants for copyright infringement? [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
