Search for: "Owen v. Owen" Results 661 - 680 of 1,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Kristina Araya
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As to the first prong, "[a]n attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legal research" (Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
However, marks comprised of a single color alone are never inherently distinctive.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
It shares the backstory and legacy of the California Supreme Court’s famous decision in National Audubon Society v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm by Buce
Gobitis (flag salute) and Lawremce v/ Texas (gay rights). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:40 pm by Maureen Johnston
Owens 14-887Issue: (1) Whether, in a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:51 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Robert Dommett v Zebra Research Pty Ltd [2011] APO 53 (12 July 2011) Inventorship – request under section 32 of the Patents Act 1990 – entitlement – request under section 36 of the Patents Act 1990 – identification of ‘inventive concept’ – whether inventor’s prior disclosure of inventive concept precludes claiming inventorship and/or entitlement in a subsequent patent application This Australian Patent Office decision, by Hearing Officer… [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
This is the headnote summary (not available without subscription online) of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal's 2006 decision in that case, Owens v. [read post]