Search for: "P----D v. C----S"
Results 661 - 680
of 5,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Rather, it was the stuff of consolidation under § 315(d). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:26 am
Si el contrato social no se hubiere otorgado en escritura o póliza ante fedatario público, pero contuviere los requisitos que señalan las fracciones I a VII del artículo 6o., cualquiera persona que figure como socio podrá demandar en la vía sumaria el otorgamiento de la escritura o póliza correspondiente....... [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:42 am
BRUCE D. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
(Id. at p. 283.) [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
It's certainly not cheap, but it's at least possible in some cases after Hamilton v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(2). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:24 am
(d) The age of each at termination. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Décision Même si la sévérité d’une peine prise isolément ne soulève pas une question de droit, cette question constitue en l’espèce un élément intégral et essentiel de l’analyse constitutionnelle. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:16 pm
Sobre el origen de la creación de estos vehículos hechos para la agricultura en los Estados Unidos, Hernández Peña indicó “en el mismo equipo el fabricante tiene un ‘warning’ que dice: no transitar por vía pública, no más de una persona, no bajo los efectos de bebidas alcohólicas, estos equipos no son aptos para transitar en las calles”. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
In re Rafael C., supra. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
P. 52(a)(6). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
C., P. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:05 pm
* Norms of the sector and three-dimentional marks' distinctiveness: a complicated relationship.Valentina write up Case C-445/13 P , a CJEU decision regarding a 3-D trade mark consisting of the shape of a bottle and its distinctive character. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Doc. 775, p. 2. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:06 am
P. de Bandt (&DE BANDT), Professor V. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Acuff-Rose case, where the court explained that the more an unauthorized derivative work is transformative, the more likely such use is fair under §107 of the Copyright Act (p. 13).Transformative works can be mash-ups, remixes, fan-fiction, fan-made videos, or can also be works of visual arts which incorporate elements of previous works, such as Richard Prince’s CanalZone series which led in the U.S. to the much debated Cariou v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:58 am
P. 54(d)(1) in this Lanham Act false advertising case involving steam dryer advertising. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe caseThis is about the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM [Case C‑396/15 P], another trade mark case upon parallel stripes and shoes. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : À la lumière de R. c. [read post]