Search for: "Parallel Productions, Inc."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
[…] The public policy behind the “inurement” rule closely parallels the public policy behind the “naked licensing” rule: so long as consumers get a consistent product/service experience associated with the mark, then consumers are not deceived. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
AT&T, Inc., et. al. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Spring Medical Systems Inc., et. al. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Your processor/service agreement should define the uses to which the GenAI technology developer will make of prompt data and should be parallel with the purposes you disclose at the point of collection and in your privacy policy. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
These companies don’t appear to aggregate the data over time and, in some cases, they track it using non-parallel categories so that comparison is difficult. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Google Inc., No. 12-2050 (W.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
" That's not analysis, that's rationalization.- The court goes with the dissent, not the majority opinion, in In re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelity Leads Products Liability Litigation, 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Macy’s Inc., 2023 WL 8811499, No. 1:17-cv-754 (S.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Ipsco, Inc., 2009 WL 4403364 (N.D.Ill. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Glassdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:59 am
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Do you provide a framework to punish the original maker of the faulty product (see Asahi) or do you rein that in and inject (not my words) "objective rationality" (see Dunlop) to shield makers from unintended and unforeseeable outcomes? [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
This article was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily, part of LexisNexis Canada Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:27 am
As the Court stated in Bard Ranch, Inc.: the ditch follows the right. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:58 am
Mid-State Consultants, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
See Omega Eng'g, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
In re the Republic of Ecuador is a request for the issuance of a subpoena for the taking of depositions and the production of documents in a foreign proceeding under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:13 pm
Drum roll, please, it reads: "Google™ is a registered trademark of Google Inc. [read post]
