Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
United States, No. 11-5002 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:10 am
Were we able to predict the future, we would be betting on further proceedings after the decision in CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v Cuomo; 2012 NY Slip Op 50073(U) ; Decided on January 19, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County; Singh, J. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Sackett v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
International Harvester, Inc., 718 F.2d 88, 96 (3d Cir.1983); United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
Review Granted United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, S197722—Review Granted and Held—December 21, 2011 The court ordered briefing deferred pending the decision in Kirby v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
This new section on infill projects will not apply until the state has developed infill guidelines. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
United States, 91 U.S. 367 (1875). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
No lay witnesses exist to testify as to whether a defendant's act of putting these parcels in the mail or on an airplane constituted an intentional and clandestine conspiratorial effort to get the charged, legal merchandise into the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm
Univ. of Cincinnati v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:01 am
United States, No. 09-289 L (Oct. 25, 2011). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm
The analogy to the deed is a good one because United States [patent] claims serve to define the outer limits or boundaries of the invention in the same fashion as the description of land in a deed defines the outer limits of the land monopoly. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:59 am
” The court also held “that the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 09 CVS 2582 (N.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
United Parcel Service Inc., N.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:55 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 09-CV-5291 (N.D. [read post]
