Search for: "Parker v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
In Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
Moreover, DOJ components should clearly state that noncompliance with these “voluntary standards will not, in itself, result in any enforcement action. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 2:27 am
Case Name: Garay v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm
The machine-to-transformation is not, according to the US Supreme Court, the only definitive test, but more of "...a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under §101".Gavin always thought in the abstractThe majority's decision hinged heavily on its previous decisions of Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
Parker The post Episode 005: CAVC Oral Argument: Simmons v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
(stating same); Friberg-Cooper Water Supply Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:11 am
" Parker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Parker Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:17 pm
From the Complaint in Parker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
Parker issued today in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:07 am
In a recent Texas car accident case, Williams v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
