Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 661 - 680
of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
"Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
In DeShaney v. [read post]
14 Jun 2025, 6:05 am
The decision came in A.J.T. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:47 am
To do so, Pollack uses the example of People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
The case revolves around the “insanity defense,” an ancient doctrine under which people who committed crimes because of their severe mental illness would not be held legally culpable. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
Donny Kevin Davis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
”Following the Civil War, legal thinkers seemed to understand that the Constitution could and did empower both the federal and state governments to regulate “the people” concurrently. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
Ex Parte Gregory v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:04 pm
The work is fulfilling, important, diverse, and fascinating: we encounter just about every imaginable human conflict, in practically every legal setting. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
Then the opinion continues with some legal analysis. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Nothing's "legally" wrong with what transpired.But I think the process is far from optimal. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which is why even trained lawyers like the prosecutor and defense counsel disagree on what it says.But the trial judge simply reads the instruction to the jurors and lets these legally untrained folk figure out for themselves what even two lawyers and a judge couldn't resolve.At which point the Court of Appeal typically says: "Well, we presume the jury followed the properly given instructions. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
What -- either practically or legally -- stops the prosecution from filing a new complaint that says that as of today he's a danger to others? [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
As most of the underlying legal issues in AHM v. [read post]
