Search for: "People v Lord" Results 661 - 680 of 1,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Some people credit Thompson with framing the question that Sen. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am by INFORRM
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of  R(C) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Carnwath provisionally stated that the decision in 2005 was the exercise of prerogative powers for the conduct of foreign relations. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
 In Brand v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), a masseuse was held to have harassed celebrity couple, Russell Brand and Jemima Khan, by accusing them of serious criminal offending in the media, in emails to numerous people, and in an online petition. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:50 am by INFORRM
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy How to avoid defamation – Steven Price La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law:… [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
That people can go back on what they have said they will do in letters. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44 of the… [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The matter went all the way to the House of Lords and was a [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
Judicial observations such as those of Lord Reid in Wickman Machine Tools Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG [1974] AC 235, 251 and Lord Diplock in Antaios Cia Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB (The Antaios) [1985] AC 191, 201, quoted by Lord Carnwath at para 110, have to be read and applied bearing that important point in mind. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the application for permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print (and the two other linked Lachaux cases) was referred to a Lord/Lady Justice for a decision on the papers. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Giles Peaker
She feels particularly vulnerable to most people being men late at night, often under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:09 pm by Elim
Davies & Justine Pila, The Jurisprudence of Lord Hoffmann (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am by Nicholas Gebelt
  The Lord then confronted Eve, who immediately pointed the finger at the serpent:  “And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 The order's heyday is long gone and you would be foolish to advise a client that they could walk down to their local court and obtain one unless they have an extremely strong case against the respondent, that the damage was/could be very serious and that they had clear evidence that the respondents were in possession of the relevant information and there was a strong possibility they would destroy the material should they be put on notice of the application (see Lord Justice… [read post]