Search for: "People v White (Robert)" Results 661 - 680 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Instead, Judge Kavanaugh read the Supreme Court’s Heller decision and its 2010 decision in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Indigenous peoples make up over 30% of the federal prison population despite being just 5% of the overall Canadian public.[2] Black Canadians are incarcerated across the country 3-4 times more often than could be expected based on their demographic population[3] and recently acknowledged by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Morris 2021 ONCA 680 and the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in R. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Robert Harlan, however, had risen from slavery to wealth and power. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:28 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Jordan Brunner and Amira Mikhail summarized the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily 10 fascinating facts about Robert F. [read post]
The news that former national security adviser Michael Flynn has reached a cooperation and plea deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller could not come as less of a surprise. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Assuming that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito are no more likely to find an Equal Protection right to abortion than Rehnquist or White was, at least three and probably five judges of the current Supreme Court might take the view that a law that is challenged as an Equal Protection violation should be easier to justify if it violates a substantial Due Process right, as well. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Assuming that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito are no more likely to find an Equal Protection right to abortion than Rehnquist or White was, at least three and probably five judges of the current Supreme Court might take the view that a law that is challenged as an Equal Protection violation should be easier to justify if it violates a substantial Due Process right, as well. [read post]