Search for: "People v. Day (1992)" Results 661 - 680 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm by msatta
We need to support these women with childcare, a financial plan if she has to give up her day-job to run, and address self-care on the cam [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitution hasn’t changed since 1989 (save for the rightly famous 27th Amendment, enacted in 1992). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Just what Bradley worries people might find. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
” But, starting from some of the same historical bases, a group named Academics for the Second Amendment (law professors who set up their group in 1992 to advocate an individual rights interpretation) comes out differently. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
  Oddly enough, "no one has noticed any steep decline in the ambition of able people to serve in Congress as a consequence of the lousy pay. [read post]