Search for: "People v. Holder"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Noting that because the defendant was not a regular occupant of the facility or a likely infringer, the Ninth Circuit affirmed an award of attorneys fees in his favor.[8] [1]Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). [2] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018] [3] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018] [4] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018] [5] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v… [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
In her FTC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Weight Watchers Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:25 pm
In this case, YouTube v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Supreme CourtIn Allen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am
In Taylor v Mina An Ltd [2019] UKUT 249 (LC) the Upper Tribunal has overturned a refusal of a Rent Repayment Order by the First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:03 pm
This phenomenon began after the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
TM holder free riding/trolling: pressure on mark exclusions/defenses. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Holder. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm
Many people use their health cards for identification purposes. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
For one of the prior cases on this, Morris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
I attribute this to the topic, to many people's interest in Google's views (though one of the organizers stressed that Dr. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm
A patent holder could control a market, limit competition, and raise prices for us all. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Few people feel that way today. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
The amendment establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of the right-holder as long as its name/pseudonym appears linked to the communication of the work to the public, which Microsoft was able to prove. [read post]
