Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 661 - 680 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am by admin
Housing is what makes places into cities, because cities are where people live in close proximity, and when the people move to the city faster than the city is willing to cope with them, the result is an explosion of informality and slums. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:36 pm by Cheryl Nyberg
On Tuesday, 11/3, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Hemi Group, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:57 am
When people have wised up to this, the Court has concocted a new metaphor and eased an old one from the scene. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:13 am by stu@crimapp.com
In People v DePiazza, Court of Appeals No. 284946, the Court of Appeals finally struck down one application of Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA).Robert DiPiazza was convicted at the age of eighteen for consensual sex with his then fifteen year old girl friend. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Abney and Allen (2009 NY Slip Op 07668 10/27/09) the Court of Appeals considered two cases in which the defense was denied the right to introduce expert testimony on identification evidence. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
The US Third Circuit Court of Appeals, covering New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware, recently released a decision in the case of Prowel v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
Some of you, ignoring that the famous Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinion, brushed Buck v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
  Didn't Oliver Wendell Holmes give it a big push with The Common Law in 1909 or so? [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
I suggested that the canon should not only include super-precedents like Brown v. [read post]