Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 661 - 680
of 736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2009, 12:45 pm
That happened, for example, in INS v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
See DePriest v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:40 am
" People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
See Kerr, supra, at 1210-12. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:14 am
I'm curious to see what people like Orin Kerr and Scott Greenfield have to say. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
I'm curious to see what people like Orin Kerr and Scott Greenfield have to say. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
Kerr, supra, at 506. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:55 pm
All of this is consistent with Orin Kerr's statement that empathy is often indispensable when judges "to try to assess the real-world impact of a particular practice on a person or group of people. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:00 pm
In the 1987 case New York v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
" But very esteemed judges have made strikingly similar observations concerning the role of race and gender in the law.O'Connor and Gender PerspectivesIn the case J.E.B. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:38 am
Just a few weeks ago, the Court decided in Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The Board contains no women and, apparently, no people of color. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
I suspect that Kerr is one of those people who believes that every word of a Supreme Court opinion is imbued with special powers, chosen for its precise and consequential meaning. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:35 pm
The jury instructions in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
With that said, his post speculating on how the brand new SCOTUS case Arizona v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the high court held in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:43 pm
In People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:58 pm
New York, Katz v. [read post]
