Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 661 - 680
of 40,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
And that guys like this may well be suspicious.But still. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Talk about being unknowingly prescient . . . .This opinion was issued on May 12, 2020. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:26 pm
" That home search may only take 15 minutes, but the guy was nonetheless required to "remain[] within the interior premises of his or her residence during the hours designated by the correctional administrator," so he'd get custody credits for the full amount of time he was on GPS monitoring. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:53 am
People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
On 19 May 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams handed down judgment in Prismall v Google UK Limited & Another [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB). [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm
Finally, the widely cited 2001 U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
(See Butz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:51 am
In People v Mack, 2007 NY Slip Op 02824, the defendant was initially assigned counsel for pending felony murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 2:14 am
Iancu v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 7:31 am
Decker Complaint) on May 27, 2009, charging that the government is violating the law by incarcerating people for prolonged periods of time, sometimes... [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:06 am
In People v Faulkner, 2007 NY Slip Op 00338, the voir dire was not fully transcribed--to the defendant's benefit. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
Additional Resources: Kelter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
You may perhaps be granted parole, but the trial court properly found that you're not entitled to resentencing. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
We still impart incredible significance in sentencing to chance: A and B may commit the exact same crime, in exact same settings, but if A's victim falls one way, and B's victim falls another, the punishment we give to identical acts is often radically disparate.P.S. - As to how Ms. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:57 pm
An opinion that, for many readers, may perhaps have more practical import.It's a brief story about a police officer who tries to be nice. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
Especially in a murder case, where there's a lot at stake.Plus, although Justice Greenwood's opinion doesn't mention it, I think there may also be a fairness principle at stake here. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
You may well get your sentence reduced.But let's say that, instead of pleading guilty, or losing at trial straight up, you were found not guilty by reason of insanity. [read post]
