Search for: "People v. New"
Results 661 - 680
of 41,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Its theme is “People, Power and Place. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:35 pm
PubPat v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:37 pm
Where as in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
(Once again, I suggest a new motto for special education: special education - bringing people together.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:10 pm
Wells Fargo & Company (Fraudulent Banking Practices)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlThe People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:54 am
(Fabiano v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 12:36 pm
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlPublic Service Company of New Mexico v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
The Law & Indigenous Peoples Program at University of New Mexico School of Law hosts U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:42 am
We also love her for providing an updated version of Wood v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams V. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:01 pm
Recently I wrote about how the Supreme Court decisions in Melendez-Diaz(129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]) and Briscoe v Virginia (559 US ___ [1/25/10]) appeared to undermine and contracidt hte holdings of the New York Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]). [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
We have recently learned of a new contested case, filed in December, 2008, in Wichita, Kansas, Elektra Entertainment Group v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Assigned counsel promptly moved within five days of his appointment to dismiss the indictment on the ground that defendant had improperly been denied her right to testify before the Grand Jury.see also, People v Mason, 176 AD2d 356 [2nd Dept 1991] [five day period extended where new counsel is assigned]; People v Backman, 274 AD2d 432 [2nd Dept 2000] [same]. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:34 am
The Kunz & Chomsky casebook contains a bounty of new... [read post]
