Search for: "People v. Sharp" Results 661 - 680 of 1,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
”  At PrawfsBlawg, Matt Bodie considers how the decision in Harris might play out if, as many people believe, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd began before Sharp J (without a jury) on Monday 31 October 2011. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Google is to remove private medical records from search results after people request action. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Steve Hall
Sharp, a white man, was sentenced to death after a trial by a jury of 11 whites and one black. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
There are too many possible stories about how you are the people, and the other people are usurpers or mobs. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:46 am
This approach offers a relatively simple answer to one of the most important problems in constitutional theory: How do we explain the evident fact that the structure of our government and the rights of the people have changed pervasively since the Founding, in ways that are simply not reflected in Article V amendments to the canonical text? [read post]