Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm
One of the most famous is Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court denied the Bivens claim primarily on a no-entity-liability theory (foreshadowed in the public context by FDIC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The speakers with me on the session were Giovanni Dosi, Director, Institute of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Pisa and Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, University of Sussex. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
Hundreds of people were bused in from all over the country by DC-Cam and other organizations. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:01 pm
From Morland-Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
The panel is to consist of one judge from the superior court, a doctor licensed to practice medicine in Massachusetts, as well as an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
The panel is to consist of one judge from the superior court, a doctor licensed to practice medicine in Massachusetts, as well as an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
The public power utility and police racially profiled Asian communities in the illegal data-sharing scheme.SACRAMENTO—The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) searches entire zip codes’ worth of people’s private data and discloses it to police without a warrant or any suspicion of wrongdoing, according to a privacy lawsuit filed Wednesday in Sacramento County Superior Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Sensibly, no one said well, any amount of time we choose is somewhat arbitrary, so the state can hold people indefinitely. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
For instance, in Qualcomm v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:36 am
He acknowledged that the present justice delivery system in the country poses “multiple barriers for the common people” and that the “workings of the courts do not sit well with the complexities of India”. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:42 am
From today's decision in City of Newark v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court in Ballew v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:53 am
In Focht v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
On the rare occasions that the UK courts have disagreed with ECtHR case law, the Strasbourg Court has shown itself willing to engage in ‘judicial dialogue’ with the superior courts of the UK. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal also reviewed these provisions in R. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
Few people, particularly on the left, pine for the return of Bowers v. [read post]
