Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 5:58 am
I don’t know how I’m going to be able to handle all of these people being pregnant at once. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
Melevsky v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:19 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:11 pm
In today's Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
This Tuesday, the Supreme Court held in Jesner et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:46 pm
Last spring, I published a short essay about the relationship between the entry-ban litigation and Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:10 pm
A lack of resources given the volume seen in the Superior Court has. caused everything to slow down to a stall. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Recent examples include the television series The People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
The CRTC has the relevant powers of a court of superior jurisdiction and already makes decisions that affect the fundamental freedoms of Canadians. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
" And third, we now know exactly what the Agreement said, because Daniels has put it into the public record, appending it to a Complaint she recently filed in CA Superior Court seeking a declaration that the Agreement is invalid and unenforceable [more on this suit below]. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
In prior cases the appeals court had recognized the superiority of, and a preference for, secret ballot elections over bargaining orders. [read post]
