Search for: "People v. Walker" Results 661 - 680 of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
Supreme Court devastated the strengths of the Voting Rights Act in the Supreme Court case of Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Scotland In the case of Hiram v Mullen [2020] SC EDIN 23, Sheriff Cottam awarded a professional dog walker £3,000 damages against a business rival for a defamatory Facbook post. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The protection given to public officials by Sullivan in US law has been extended to embrace public figures in general (Curtis Publishing Co v Butts, Associated Press v Walker 388 US 130 [1967]) Nor is a complete bar necessary to ensure freedom of speech. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jeff Walker, Sony Music: Broad safe haven for non-passive entertainment platforms to offer content to consumers. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  People who were born before ads could be skipped will be thinking of (various) lonely repairmen, because the smelly washing machine cases are back: BSH Home Appliances Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  Mr Pell’s answer was “George Carman QC who defeated them in high profile jury trials: Walker & ors v Yachting World, Branson v Snowden & G Tech and R v Ken Dodd respectively”. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ agree with the reasons given by both Lord Hope and Lord Rodger. [read post]