Search for: "People v. White" Results 661 - 680 of 6,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
From this perspective, it is irrelevant that white people cannot reasonably be considered a group unable to take care of itself in the political process, and it also (seemingly) irrelevant whether the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment understood they were protecting white persons and disavowed race-based affirmative action (which they did not). [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm by Sandra Park
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The White House denied that it would issue the leaked version of the executive order, but it did not denounce the leaked executed order, leaving the door open to future attacks against LGBT people, people seeking reproductive health care, women, and religious minorities. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
He's going to continue to do everything that he can to make sure that we protect people's freedoms. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
I am sure that the Blogosphere will be blogging about this op-ed by Judge Morris Hoffman, who conducted an empirical study which analyzed sentences handed out to people represented by public defenders v. privately retained counsel. [read post]
12 May 2009, 5:53 am
The standard in the statute equates to the rule used in circumstantial evidence cases (see People v Borrero, 26 NY2d 430, 434- 435; People v Bearden, 290 NY 478, 480). [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
Over on Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has posted a thoughtful and fair-minded response to our study of public interpretations of the Scott v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by JB
It has been repeatedly invoked to protect the interests of employers over labor, men over women, white people over black people, and so on. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The White House issued a veto threat in response to the For the People Act, citing separation of powers, federalism, and First Amendment concerns about the election reform provisions of the bill. [read post]