Search for: "Pictures Words, Inc." Results 661 - 680 of 1,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 1:08 pm by Elliot Setzer
” In other words, the app grants public health officials access to personally identifiable information and location trails. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Class 46 blogger and Taylor Wessing associate Christian Tenkhoff provides an analysis of Case T-106/14 Universal Utility International GmbH & Co.KG v OHIM, in which the General Court of the European Union ('GC') tackled registrability of the word mark GREENWORLD.* Spain: Did the “Google Tax” really change the market? [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:09 am by David Post
TRO-Ludlow Music, Inc. reserves all rights under the United States Copyright law in connection with this usage. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:50 pm
This is just a sample of just the structured settlement industry Do you get the picture? [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals ofWashington (Division 1):  State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:48 pm
PepsiCo, Inc.,  Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
We see use of such language as “unacceptable”, “skewed”, “fatal loss of confidence…”, “misapprehension”,  and repeated use of the word “misuse[s]”. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 276080 (Fed. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
A motion picture based on the book was released with fictitious characters who resembled the actual persons from the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 663 F.Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:27 am by admin
Yes; I don’t want to picture Rush Limbaugh anywhere near a sex tape. [read post]