Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 661 - 680 of 177,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 6:27 am
Judge Carter disposed of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim based on the defendant’s unauthorized copying of the plaintiffs’ wedding photo from their Facebook page by noting that the complaint inadequately alleged that the defendant had accessed a “protected computer” as the term is defined under the Act, and that the plaintiffs’ allegations of harm to reputation and lost potential business did not claim the sort of damages recoverable… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Plaintiffs device tracking claim is reminiscent of privacy claims asserted in the divorce context, and perhaps that’s the genesis of the statute. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:15 am by The Ansara Law Firm
  It’s not uncommon for defense attorneys to challenge the credibility of plaintiffs to challenge their own client’s liability. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The court then reversed the decision of the lower court and allowed the plaintiffs case to proceed to trial. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:22 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The plaintiffs attorney refused the request, responding that the requested information was not relevant to the plaintiffs claims. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:25 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion for a new trial on damages or for remittitur because the jury’s $57 million award was based on the entire market value rule and plaintiff failed to offer evidence that its patented disc-discrimination technology drove demand for personal computers. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 8:13 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
When multiple parties contribute to a plaintiffs injuries, the plaintiff may benefit from the guidance of a Maryland personal injury attorney. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
 Plaintiff’s Brief is here, Wachovia’s Brief, filed yesterday afternoon, is here. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:52 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
May 25, 2022) (memorandum opinion), plaintiff was an inmate at defendant county’s jail. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:03 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Further, on at least one claim plaintiff made against defendant ex-husband, the Court found that plaintiffs pleadings lacked the requisite particularity. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Defendant argued that if the studies cited in plaintiffs expert witness report were allowed to be presented as evidence in the deposition (and in turn, to jurors), it could unduly prejudice defendants. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The court went on to explain that such expert testimony is necessary to a jury’s determination of both the scope of the doctor’s duty to disclose and the element of causation. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:06 pm by Podhurst Orseck
Takata’s admission of a defect isn’t the same as admitting liability, said Peter Prieto, of Miami’s Podhurst Orseck, chair lead counsel for the plaintiffs in more than 100 lawsuits coordinated before U.S. [read post]