Search for: "Powell v. Doe"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
If the Court takes the case, it would likely clarify the “foreseeability” test for clear articulation first formulated by Justice Powell—something of a foe of antitrust enforcement—in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
The prosecution argued that (i) there was no inconsistency and (ii) if “there is, it does not constitute error. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
And: Arbitrariness in the imposition of the death penalty is exactly the type of thing the Constitution prohibits, as Justice Lewis Powell, Justice Potter Stewart, and I explained in our joint opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
” Second, look to what Justice Ginsburg does not say. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
., v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
This point was clearly made to the HHJ (as was the dicta in Powell about the purpose of the introductory tenancy regime, requiring a high standard of behaviour, and all that guff) and who does not really comment on it. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
This point was clearly made to the HHJ (as was the dicta in Powell about the purpose of the introductory tenancy regime, requiring a high standard of behaviour, and all that guff) and who does not really comment on it. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Powell, 130 S.Ct. 1195 (2010). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
It is settled case law that ‘casual’ or ‘mere’ clinical negligence does not amount to a breach of the operational duty: a doctor treating a patient does not (in the absence of systemic abuse or gross negligence) owe an ‘operational duty’ under Article 2, and any remedy against his or her negligence is to be found purely in the law of tort [see Powell v UK (2000) 30 EHRR CD 362]. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:08 pm
" Later Powell observed that Skinner v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
So, once a possession order has been made, does the court have any discretion to revisit or extend a period of stay beyond 6 weeks? [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
So, once a possession order has been made, does the court have any discretion to revisit or extend a period of stay beyond 6 weeks? [read post]
