Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 4:21 pm
(Will Baude) A Tennessee prosecutor in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Powell (08-1175), petitioner's reply [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:25 am
Powell, 835 F.2d 1095, 1098 (5th Cir. 1988)), the defendant has made no showing of IRS misconduct. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
’” Chaplinsky at 135 (Powell, J., concurring) (citation omitted). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:02 am
Powell (supporting petitioner) No. 08-645: Abbott v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm
Because I am teaching a course this fall on the fourteenth amendment, I’ve been meaning to post on the upcoming big case, Fisher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
” 450 U.S. at 362 (Powell, J., concurring) (emphasis in original). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
Powell. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:32 am
Brendlin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Powell. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
Powell v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
Ryan Powell, No. 102,749 (Greenwood)Direct appeal (petition for review); Felony theftKorey A. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:03 am
Powell, 2011 Mass. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
In FEC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
" But the Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the scope of this provision in Powell v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:40 am
Wikipedia reports that Nixon nominated Powell and Rehnquist on the same day. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
