Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Supp. 1217, es parcialmente confirmado y parcialmente revocado.BLACKMUN, J., emitió la opinión de la Corte, en la que se unieron BURGER, CJ, y DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL y POWELL, JJ. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Judge Michael Powell dissented. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:06 am
Justice Powell's majority opinion in Healy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm
In addition to the scheduled events mentioned here, there are a number of issues that merit watching but that do not have a fixed date for developments to take place: ACA Internat’l v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
As Justice Lewis Powell observed in a 1977 concurring opinion in Abood v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:37 am
Some have wondered about whether the Senate might refuse to seat him; I explain in the piece why that is inconsistent with the constitutional understanding set forth in Powell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:51 pm
Powell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court case called Branzburg v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Compounding this is the recent Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Schemanski, attorney for appellant.Powell, Birchmeier & Powell, attorneys forrespondents (James R. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:47 pm
See Barberio-Powell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am
Powell appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States (Powell v Texas, 1968), claiming that fining him for public drunkenness constituted cruel and unusual punishment because such behavior was allegedly not of his volition. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm
Powell, 11 N.C. [read post]
