Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The UKSC will consider whether Unwired Planet, as SEP holder, made use of a ‘time advantage’ to improve its negotiation position. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:03 pm
In other words, the number has to be downright insane.Prior to the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm
S’holder Litig. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
NAMUDNO v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Where an employee of an administrative agency divulges such secrets or otherwise abuses their power, Article 39 highlights that they will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including criminal liability. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Where an employee of an administrative agency divulges such secrets or otherwise abuses their power, Article 39 highlights that they will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including criminal liability. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
In 2013, in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am
V. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
As we hope to demonstrate in “Democracy and Equality,” in our view, although the justices of the Warren Court often confronted problematic precedents, they had a deep understanding of the most fundamental reasons for judicial review and of the essential role of our Supreme Court in our constitutional system – most centrally, to make sure that majorities do not disregard the rights and interests of those without the political power to protect themselves, or abuse their… [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:51 am
Certainty, exclusivity, control and assignability have also been identified in case law as characteristics of property rights (see Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins). [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomGilham v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
See Nken v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
If IRCA bars the States from using all such information for any purpose, whether Congress has the constitutional power to so broadly preempt the States from exercising their traditional police powers to prosecute state law crimes. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Holder. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Floresand Shelby County v. [read post]
