Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 13,187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
This is “systematic risk,” exemplified by the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, which essentially affected the price of every asset. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am
On April 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am
After all, didn’t Epic Games v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
For instance, while it is understood that cryptocurrency is much more difficult to counterfeit than traditional money, it is vulnerable to other forms of fakery such as bots artificially making trades in order to sway the market price. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:48 am
ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
# # #DECISIONSouth Shore D'Lites LLC v First Class Prods. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Mineral Royalties; State Intervention) Alturas Indian Rancheria v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:39 pm
In other words, it would create significant red tape and compliance costs in an attempt to address an issue that is mostly peripheral to the stated aims, and arguably already dealt with by EU courts in Huawei v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
”[15] Material interference may be proven through several methods, such as: (i) inference from an entity’s intent to interfere, (ii) evidence that the “natural consequence” of the act or omission is interference, or (iii) evidence that the act or omission in fact interfered with a consumer’s understanding.[16] Furthermore, “it may be reasonable to presume” material interference if certain “consequential” transaction terms, such as… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
We are seeking to harmonize the minimum price increment where stocks can be quoted and transacted as well as lower these minimum increments across the markets.[14] Lastly, we put out a proposal to bring greater competition for a segment of the market related to individual investors’ marketable orders.[15] Private Funds Private fund advisers and the funds they manage play an increasingly important role in our capital markets. [read post]
