Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois" Results 661 - 680 of 834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2010, 10:04 am by Alison Rowe
Becker's annual Equine Case Law Update--The "case of the year" (the year's most wacky or novel case) was State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Illinois probably leads the country in cases filed, but many states have done so, participating in an FTC sweep. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm by Ilya Somin
During that time, numerous state supreme courts have invalidated Keo-like “economic development” takings under their state constitutions — including Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Carolina (see this article for cites to these cases). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Justice Stevens wrote for a unanimous Court in Illinois Tools Works v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
Department of Justice and the States of Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin against Dean Foods Company for violating Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
  Less than 12% of hospital’s patients are covered by Medicaid.[23]  While this may not be as high as other hospitals it still requires the hospital to cost-shift in order to make up for the amount that is not reimbursed.[24]  In addition, in Illinois there has not been a Medicaid inpatient rate increase since 1995.[25]  The high deficit in Illinois as well as in other states is having an impact on hospitals financially. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
The case is State of New York, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
Companies sometimes request that their flights and tail numbers be kept secret to protect the security of their executives and to prevent disclosure of business trips that could affect stock prices or give competitors an edge about potential deals. [read post]