Search for: "ROBERT W POWERS" Results 661 - 680 of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
According to Robert Blackwill and Jennifer Harris: Roughly around the time of the Vietnam War, and continuing through to later stages of the Cold War, U.S. administrations began to see economics as a realm with an authority and logic all its own, usually no longer subjugated to traditional state power realities—and something to be kept free of unseemly geopolitical incursions in any case. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
This expansion of Form PF data collection is the latest reflection of the Commission’s unquestioning faith in the Benevolent Power of More, a faith that I do not share. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Question: The opening chapter of Storm Center (titled “A Struggle for Power”) begins with an extended discussion of the “law and politics” of the Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
Justice Alito cited the brief and a Natelson article in his concurring opinion. 140 S.Ct. 2246, 2268, 2270 (2020) (Alito, J., concurring); Robert G. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “[b]y taking the Maryland case, the court underscored that partisan gerrymandering isn’t the province of one party alone, but a tool that can be employed by either Republicans or Democrats to extend power when they hold the political advantage. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am by Guest Author
Morgan is a law clerk on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and a former clerk for Judge Carlton W. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:21 am by mmoreland
Blackett from Vanderbilt University, David W. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]he court’s conservatives were criticized by liberals and religious conservatives for that decision. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 am by Nathan Koppel
Did you talk to Chief Justice Roberts about Hogan? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:34 am by Ray Mullman
  In case after case, the five hard-core Republicans of the Roberts Court have been chopping furiously at the hard-earned legal rights of workers, consumers, voters, and others who dare to challenge the power of big business elites to reign over us, both politically and economically. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
§ 1505, provides that “[w]hoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede ... the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress” shall face criminal consequences. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 3:00 pm
Robert Thibault (Liberal) Q: A technological neutral approach is understandable (impossible to control) -  but eventually we will have to consider technological specificity (consent mechanisms may not be there): what about health care? [read post]