Search for: "Redding v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Yes, the agency could still sue in federal court, but the higher costs of litigation in court and on the road plus the hostility of forums in “red” jurisdictions imply that fewer actions would be brought or won. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:26 am
Walton of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently granted an injunction sought by the American Bar Association (“ABA”) that prohibits the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) from enforcing the Red Flags Rule against attorneys. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(2) expressly excludes from the reach of the political offense exception several categories of offenses, including the following: (i) a murder or willful crime against the person of a Head of State of one of the Contracting States, or a member of the Head of State’s family; (ii) an offense for which both Contracting States have the obligation pursuant to a multilateral international agreement to extradite the person sought or to submit the case to… [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
Red Hat and Novell (March 2010), and Judge Ward's reduction of a jury award of $52 million in LaserDynamics v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Robert Odell
Freeze has stated on their blog: “Ironically, Bingham McCutchen knew their arbitration agreement, as originally drafted, was invalid in light of a 2009 Massachusetts Supreme Court opinion: Warfield v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
SANDERSCourt name & docket number:United States District Court for the Middle District of PennsylvaniaNo. 3:CV 1592Judge:James MunleyAttorneys:For Plaintiffs: Richard A. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
And the dollar-damages issue is a red herring. [read post]