Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc." Results 661 - 680 of 3,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
” In her declaration, Lee stated that the “Critical Vendors” fall into the following four categories: (1) Safety and Regulatory Compliance Suppliers and Service Providers; (2) Equipment and Parts Suppliers and Service Providers; (3) Materials Suppliers and Service Providers; and (4) Repair and Maintenance Service Providers. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Inc., 2019 WL 8112506, No. 5:18-cv-01882-JGB (SHKx) (C.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Refuse to provide consent or a letter of “non-objection” to the “unsponsored” ADR program: The plaintiffs in Toshiba focused in on the fact that foreign issuers often provide letters of consent or “non- objection” to “unsponsored” ADR To avoid allegations the company agreed to set up the “unsponsored” ADRs, a foreign issuer should consider refusing to provide a letter of consent or “non-objection” to an… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 am by luiza
The Appellate Reversal Luckily for Banigan, the appellate court refused to adopt such a restrictive definition of the term “direct. [read post]
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 5:58 am by Nicole Pottroff
GAO found no basis to question the agency’s refusal to consider the information in the additional pages. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
W2019-00650-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.App. 2019) (Appealing a trial court contempt order stemming from a woman’s refusal to obey a court order to take down a Facebook post alleging that her ex-husband, a police officer, had abused her. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by MOTP
Texas Supreme Court continues to exempt an entire industry (the legal profession) from civil liability; lets attorneys and law firms profit from lawsuits brought to hold them accountable for wrongdoing. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:05 am by admin
Under both the civil and criminal false or misleading representation provisions of the Competition Act (sections 52 and 74.01), a pricing or other claim can violate the Act where it is either literally false or misleading (e.g., additional material information necessary for a consumer to make a purchasing decision) is not adequately disclosed. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:05 am by admin
Under both the civil and criminal false or misleading representation provisions of the Competition Act (sections 52 and 74.01), a pricing or other claim can violate the Act where it is either literally false or misleading (e.g., additional material information necessary for a consumer to make a purchasing decision) is not adequately disclosed. [read post]