Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2007, 1:00 pm
Update: Law Professor Rick Hasen -- whose new book "Remedies: Examples & Explanations" arrived in today's mail -- has a post titled "In Important Case that Could End up at the Supreme Court, 11th Circuit, on 2-1 Vote, Orders Trial on Section 2 Vote Dilution Claim from Glades County, Florida. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 8:46 pm
I will leave it to the likes of the incredible Rick Hasen and SCOTUSBlog's Lyle Deniston -- among many, many others -- to talk about the important election law elements of Monday's Supreme Court decision on voter identification in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:34 am
(Rick Hasen, Election Law Blog) Biden admin tells Supreme Court law protecting social media companies has limits (Dan Whitcomb, Reuters) Supreme Court Faces Increasing Scrutiny From Congress After Leaks (Carl Hulse, The New York Times) The post The morning read for Thursday, Dec. 8 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:44 pm
At his "Election Law" blog, Rick Hasen offers these thoughts on the ruling. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:24 pm
A draft of the chapter, "First Amendment Limits on Regulating Judicial Campaigns," written by Rick Hasen of the Election Law Blog for a forthcoming book, has been posted by the Social Science Research Network here. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:53 am
In contrast, Professor Rick Hasen offered a defense of such moves under the Democracy Canon, to extend deadlines to benefit voters.Regardless of what one thinks is right, it's a claim that might be made to the Alabama courts. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
Lyle Denniston covered the filings for this blog; Rick Hasen has posts at his Election Law Blog on the filings here (North Carolina) and here (Wisconsin). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
Early commentary comes from Rick Hasen for Slate; Jessica Levinson for NBC News; Leah Litman for The Los Angeles Times; Garrett Epps for The Atlantic; Ruthann Robson for Constitutional Law Prof Blog; David French for the National Review; Jonathan H. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:22 pm
In the wake of the Court's WRTL ruling, Rick Hasen, in a post on Election Law, urged the FEC to make a rule about "what kinds of ads can be funded with corporate and union money" before the 2008 election "gets into full gear. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm
At Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen has a series of reflections on the case from Lyle Denniston, Heather Gerken, Rick Pildes, and Nate Persily. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:21 am
Here is the second installment of Bob Bauer's response to my paper on WRTL. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
Rick Hasen (Election Law Blog) for the pointer. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:08 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports that Justice Anthony Kennedy has denied a request for a stay in a Montana case involving false speech in judicial elections. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:05 am
Amy Howe covered the request for this blog, with other coverage coming from Lyle Denniston at his blog, Jessie Hellmann of The Hill, Pete Williams of NBC, and Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that Paul Clement wrote the brief for North Carolina “as if there were still a five Justice conservative majority on the Court,” despite foreseeing a defeat by this approach, so that Clement and the state “could paint the loss as caused by the ‘liberal Justices. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Rick Hasen has some early analysis of the decision. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:20 am
We opened a presentation by Professor Rick Hasen of UC Irvine, who studies election law and created the Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses his draft article on the Roberts Court and election law. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:00 am
Also, see election law expert Rick Hasen’s Slate criticism of the appellate court’s decision. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
On Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen addresses efforts to pressure the Solicitor General to take the Emily's List case to the Supreme Court (following the FEC's decision not to seek rehearing en banc). [read post]
