Search for: "Robert B Thomas" Results 661 - 680 of 1,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
Williams Memorial Professor of Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Thomas McAffee, William S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Writing for the Court in an opinion joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (who joined the holding and most of the opinion), and Alito, Chief Justice John Roberts focused on the plain meaning of IRCA’s preemption provision. [read post]
§§ 2703(c)(1)(B), (d), which requires a showing of reasonable suspicion — but does not require probable cause. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:29 am by Paul M. Hauge
Writing for an 8-1 majority on this issue (Justice Alito would have remanded the case to the Montana courts without trying to interpret those “devilishly difficult statutory provisions”), Chief Justice Roberts concluded that Sections 113(b) and 113(h) deal only with the jurisdiction of federal courts, and have no effect on the jurisdiction of state courts to hear cases grounded in state law that effectively seek review of the adequacy of an EPA-approved cleanup. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that the ruling “preserv[es] a tool that has allowed [the SEC] to recover billions of dollars[, b]ut the justices said courts should place significant limits on what kinds of disgorgements are permissible. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
And to be sure, Fearless characterizes its contest as reflecting its "commitment" to the "[b]lack women-owned" business community. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
(Part II-A of Kennedy’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, strongly suggests that international law itself must provide for corporate liability, but indicates that “the Court need not resolve” that question.) [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Chopper Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Berkeley Law SchoolModerator: Vera Bergelson, Distinguished Professor of Law and Robert E. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Evan Lee
” Thus, both Alito and Roberts seem to be persuaded that the government should win based on what might be labeled a “tracking” theory – that Congress meant in Section 2252(b)(2) to “track” similar language elsewhere that everyone agrees covers convictions involving both adults and minors. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am by Michael Risch
Limiting patentable processes to only those that use a machine or transform matter is a useful test but is not the only test. (5 Justices - Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito)C. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
At The Interdependent Third Branch, Lawrence Friedman writes that “Thomas’s opinions preview what Chief Justice Roberts may look forward to should more justices be appointed who share not just Thomas’s interpretive approach, but his willingness to cast aside settled rules in favor of a return to the presumed original understanding of the constitution. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
So, give me a reason why Congress would do something different in (B)(i) and (B)(ii). [read post]