Search for: "Robert Rule" Results 661 - 680 of 29,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2007, 5:44 pm
Three dismaying decisions by Chief Justice John Roberts's new conservative majority. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
Yesterday we had a local appellate attorney talk to our students, and he offered a quotation from Chief Justice Roberts about how to argue effectively, including the implied writing rule that use of intensifiers is often not persuasive. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:24 pm
Robert Menendez recall effort": The Newark Star-Ledger has this news update reporting on a ruling that the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued today. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Hilary Hurd, Benjamin Wittes
Roberts will then administer a special oath required by Article I of the Constitution to the senators present: ‘‘I solemnly swear ... that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald J. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:52 am
A federal court judge in Wisconsin has rejected a request by Smith Barney to order financial advisers who now work for Robert W. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
Roberts Jr. tells law students that the president's rebuke of a ruling on corporate campaign funding and the subsequent cheering at the State of the Union address were 'very troubling.'" Joan Biskupic of USA Today has an article headlined "Roberts: Presidential address is 'pep rally.'" The Birmingham News reports that "U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:50 pm by lennyesq
Today, a version of massive resistance is again playing out, this time to the court’s ruling in the Texas abortion case — and this time, the resistance is coming from within the judiciary itself. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:22 am
"Yes, we might be able to furnish clearer guidance with more sweeping opinions, but our job is to decide cases, not promulgate comprehensive rules," Roberts said. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:32 am
"Gender Bias Issue Could Tip Chief Justice Roberts Into Ruling for Gay Marriage": Adam Liptak will have this article in Thursday's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Prior to this ruling, the answer would most certainly seem to be "yes"; however, with this ruling the answer is not so certain.The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable, unwarranted searches and seizures. [read post]