Search for: "Root v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 4,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States suggest that although the Insular Cases are plainly indefensible, ill-considered judicial intervention will pose a grave threat to procedurally legitimate self-determination and to path-dependent interests with roots in that troubled framework. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Heller) and 23 June 2022 (New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Omegle (also not cited by the court), the court said the plaintiffs’ claims “are rooted in the creation and maintenance of the platform. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am by Douglas London
For all the political tumult demanding – and exhausting – the attention of Americans – the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am by Steve Lubet
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:53 pm by admin
Lombardo, a professor at the Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta, author of “Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court and Buck v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:30 am by JB
Here is the third of three sets of discussion questions on Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Tobias Barrington Wolff
The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]