Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 661 - 680
of 62,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2010] EWCA Civ 26; [2010] WLR (D) 19 “Where planning permission had been granted for the erection of a building for storing agricultural products but the building after erection had been used only as a single dwellinghouse, there had been a change of use of the building to that of a dwellinghouse for the purposes of s 171B(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
La loi fédérale sur le recouvrement équitable des créances, qui prévoit des pénalités sévères à l'encontre de celui qui ne s'y conforme pas, s'applique à celui qui recouvre pour un tiers, mais pas à celui qui recouvre pour lui-même ni à celui qui recouvre pour lui-même une créance acquise d'un tiers… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Ces délais sont contraignants, et les parties doivent les respecter pour éviter de perdre un droit ou pour éviter d'autres pénalités. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Newman’s influential emphasis in a just-decided Connecticut abortion case, Abele v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
On Saturday I thought I'd take a break and go to the dedication of a new highway marker -- over east of here in Edgecombe County -- to the State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:45 am
R (Longato) v Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court [2009] WLR (D) 104 “The statutory procedure for an application to extend a closure order, set out in s 5(3) of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003, which provided that within a reasonable time before the hearing of an application a summons might be issued by a justice of the [...] [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:39 am
R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court; [2009] WLR (D) 92 “In exercising its power under s 64(1) Magistrates' Court Act 1980 to make ’such order as to costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’ a magistrates' court was entitled, when dismissing forfeiture proceedings, to take into account its view that the application had [...] [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
Here, Troy D. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:40 am
The Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc and Another [2008] EWCA Civ 387; [2008] WLR (D) 121 “The court would refuse to enforce the right of a director to inspect a company's accounts pursuant to s 222 of the Companies Act 1985 where the purpose of the proposed inspection was to injure the company or was improper. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:27 am
Merton London Borough Council v Sinclair Collis Ltd [2010] WLR (D) 286 “Notwithstanding the civil complaint procedure embodied in s 7(2) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (as amended), a sale of tobacco to a person under the age of 18 through a cigarette vending machine was capable of being an offence contrary to s 7(1) of the 1933 Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
I've only had a chance to read the SCt's opinion in DA's Office v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
On November 3, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The post Authorized User v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
On Monday the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited and important decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 6:31 am
Kabir v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:41 am
" I'd like to offer our first catch of the symposium in terms of election law rulings by discussing one likely to fly under the national radar: the Florida Supreme Court's ruling in Wright v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
Although intended to accomplish the same purpose as the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, S. 1504, introduced in the Senate - to... [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:56 am
Held: The Supreme Court unanimously allowed Angrove’s appeal, D&D’s agency was revoked by Angrove’s termination notice, but the money’s were not held on constructive trust for Angrove’s. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
Maroudas v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280; [2010] WLR (D) 81 “An application under s 53(5) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to upgrade a byway from a road used as a public path to a byway open to all traffic did not need to be made in a single document. [read post]
