Search for: "S. v. Social Security Administration"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 8:04 pm
But the court’s ruling treats media defendants and ordinary social media users as equally culpable for “publishing” third-party social media comments. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The court dismissed her hostile and discriminatory work environment claims as not administratively exhausted and her negligence claim as untimely, however (Radek v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
That case is looking at whether administrative law judges deciding cases under the Social Security Act should have been appointed by the President Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the SSA forfeits an appointments-clause challenge to the appointment of an administrative law judge by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
Equality of protection under the laws implies not only accessibility by each one, whatever his race, on the same terms with others to the courts of the country for the security of his person and property, but that in the administration of criminal justice he shall not be subjected, for the same offense, to any greater or different punishment. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
Specifically, the Chamber noted the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in NetChoice v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 10:01 am
Kenneth Anderson of the county public guardian’s office, the official agency of the Social Security Administration appointed to provide assistance to Ivy, testified that she required supervision and her benefits are paid into a fiduciary account. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:43 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit found that “’hearing’ means a decision after whatever process the Social Security Administration itself elects to use”. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Doe to inform school administrators that the practices violated federal law. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
” In O'Handley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:12 pm
That he qualified for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA), after the SSA found that he was disabled, in part, as a result of degenerative disc disease. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:12 pm
That he qualified for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA), after the SSA found that he was disabled, in part, as a result of degenerative disc disease. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
In Wade v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:30 am
The Act specifically provides that a business may not "Intentionally communicate or otherwise make available to the general public an individual's social security number. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Social Security Administration’s disability determination not binding on a public retirement system of this State. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Social Security Administration’s disability determination not binding on a public retirement system of this State. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
