Search for: "SMITH v. COOPER" Results 661 - 680 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Arizona for a police officer to seek to persuade an individual in custody to cooperate, after the individual has been told of his rights but neither invoked nor waived those rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Eugene Bernat, President) Bay State Animal Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
G-2/08 (PatLit) MARQUES and other organisation take united position on the Cooperation Fund (Class 46) EU communication on future of competition law framework for motor vehicle sector (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU ‘Friends of the Presidency Group’ discussing non-agricultural geographic indications (BLOG@IP::JUR) Scents and sense – or perfumes for peanuts? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami also outlined organizational changes under consideration with a focus on making the Enforcement Division more “strategic, swift, smart and successful,” including: • creating specialized groups of attorneys along product, market or transactional lines and increasing collaboration among staff across regions; • flattening the management structure of the Division and reducing the… [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
As I noted in an earlier post, in the 1979 Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica)   [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Duty of Care to Fetus Anne Posno of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP discussed Paxton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
You're sitting in your car, minding your own business, in the parking lot of a motel. [read post]